Why the Ford Excursion is the Best

Let’s take a trip back to 1999. Bill Clinton was President, Ask Jeeves is the largest search engine on the internet and Google just became a thing. The average price of gasoline is $1.17 per gallon across the U.S. People still have pagers, and it won’t be for eight more years till the first iPhone is released. It was a different time, it was the best of times. It was a time when Ford decided to make an SUV based on the Super Duty pickup line, and boy did they.

Based on the F250 Super Duty pickup, the Ford Excursion is considered a heavy duty Class 2 truck. A 3/4 ton chassis with front and rear beam axles and engine options ranging from the 5.4L Triton V-8, the 6.8L Triton V-10 and the dreamy 7.3L Power Stroke V-8 Turbo Diesel. It featured a Dana 50 front axle (it is like a Dana 60 housing with Dana 44 insides), and a Ford/Sterling 10.5 rear axle, it shared three quarters of its frame with the F250, and most of its hard components were the same as well.

Unfortunately, in 2005, due to mixed feelings on the Excursion because of its size and poor fuel economy, especially when the life of excess was coming under fire due to a tumbling economy and rapidly rising fuel costs, the decision was made to cancel the Excursion and focus on the F-150 deprived Expedition going forward.

The 7.3L and 6.8L-powered Ford Excursions are hot items in the Overland world, and those that have not been modified or tuned and are rust free are going up in value just as fast as a comparable Land Cruiser. It is not uncommon to find ‘00 and ‘01 7.3L Eddie Bauer trimmed Excursions selling for close to $20,000, regardless of mileage.

Being the ultimate plus-sized SUV, we can understand why. These monstrosities combined all the best parts of American diesel full-sized trucks, and mixed it with the legacy of big SUVs. Suddenly with that power stroke under the hood, you had a massive SUV that was infinitely reliable, could tow exceptionally well, and still managed to get over 20 miles per gallon. There is not a single vehicle like the Excursion, as it was, in a class all its own, and forever will be. Who might dethrone the king of excess? We do not know, but our money is on Rivian.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

How do modifications like an EGR delete impact the performance and reliability of the 6.0L diesel engine?

The Impact of Modifications on a 6.0L Diesel Engine’s Performance and Reliability

Modifying a 6.0L diesel engine can significantly enhance its performance and reliability when done correctly. One popular modification is the EGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation) delete. This process involves removing or bypassing the EGR system, which is originally designed to reduce emissions by recirculating a portion of the exhaust gas back into the engine cylinders.

Enhanced Performance

1. Improved Power: Many users notice an increase in overall engine power and responsiveness after an EGR delete. Without the EGR recirculating exhaust gases, the engine receives a more consistent supply of fresh air, leading to more efficient combustion.
2. Better Fuel Efficiency: By eliminating the EGR system, some drivers experience marginal improvements in fuel efficiency. With cleaner, hotter airflow, the engine can operate more efficiently, making better use of the air-fuel mixture.

Reliability Gains

1. Reduced Engine Wear: The EGR system can reintroduce carbon deposits into the engine, potentially clogging components over time. Removing the EGR system helps keep the engine cleaner, reducing the risk of buildup that can lead to wear and tear.
2. Lower Maintenance Costs: By removing components that are prone to failure or clogging, such as the oil cooler or fan clutch, you might decrease overall maintenance demands. This can translate into fewer unexpected repairs and lower long-term costs.

However, it’s important to weigh the pros and cons. While modifications like an EGR delete can boost performance and reliability, they may also lead to legal and environmental compliance issues. Always ensure that any modifications align with the local regulations to avoid potential fines or penalties.

In summary, strategic modifications to the 6.0L diesel engine, like the EGR delete, can significantly enhance both performance and reliability, letting the engine deliver robust power without the drawbacks of some factory components.

How do driving behaviors and vehicle design contribute to the perception of SUVs as high-risk for rollovers?

Understanding the Rollover Risks of SUVs

When it comes to the perception of SUVs as prone to rollovers, two main factors come into play: driving behaviors and inherent vehicle design.

Vehicle Design

1. High Center of Gravity: SUVs are built with a higher center of gravity compared to standard cars. While this design is excellent for off-road capability and provides a commanding view of the road, it also makes them more susceptible to tipping over during sharp turns or sudden maneuvers.
2. Weight Distribution: SUVs often carry more weight up high, especially when fully loaded with passengers and cargo. This can shift the vehicle’s balance, increasing the risk of rollover in high-speed situations or abrupt directional changes.

Driving Behaviors

1. Aggressive Driving: Many drivers operate SUVs with the same expectations as smaller, sportier cars. Attempting quick maneuvers or taking turns at high speeds can destabilize an SUV, given its shift in weight dynamics.
2. Underestimating Stopping Distances: SUVs require longer stopping distances due to their size and mass. Drivers who don’t adjust for this difference may find themselves making sudden, sharp corrections, which can lead to loss of control.

Striking a Balance

While SUVs carry inherent benefits for those needing space and versatility, understanding their limits is crucial. Observing cautious driving techniques—like slowing down for turns and allowing for greater stopping distances—can significantly mitigate rollover risks. In summary, recognizing both the design features and adapting driving habits can help drivers safely enjoy the benefits of SUVs.

What are the cost implications of “bulletproofing” a 6.0L diesel engine, and how do labor rates affect this?

Understanding the Cost of “Bulletproofing” a 6.0L Diesel Engine

When considering the “bulletproofing” of a 6.0L diesel engine, there are several cost factors to keep in mind. This popular process involves enhancing the engine’s reliability by replacing and upgrading certain components. Let’s break down the financial implications:

Component Costs

Upgrading a 6.0L diesel engine typically involves replacing the head studs, EGR cooler, oil cooler, and FICM. Depending on the quality and brand of parts, these can range from $2,000 to $4,000. Brands like ARP for head studs, BulletProof Diesel for EGR and oil coolers, and Sinister Diesel for other enhancements are commonly preferred.

Labor Rates

Labor costs will significantly impact the total expense of the bulletproofing process. Rates vary greatly by region, influencing the final bill substantially:

• Low-cost regions: Expect labor charges anywhere from $1,000 to $2,500. Some areas with lower living costs offer more competitive rates.
• High-cost regions: Here, labor costs could climb to $3,000 or more, not uncommon in urban centers or areas with a higher standard of living.

Total Costs

Combining parts and labor, the total cost for bulletproofing might range from $5,000 to $8,000. However, this is a broad estimate, as specific situations and additional requirements can push these figures higher. Some individuals have reported spending upwards of $8,000, particularly when unforeseen repairs or premium components are involved.

Key Takeaways

• Research Local Rates: It’s wise to obtain quotes from multiple shops. Different shops may offer varied pricing based on their expertise and location.
• Understanding Your Vehicle: Consider if your vehicle has specific additional needs. For example, pre-2006 models may have different suspension systems, impacting overall repair costs.
• Plan for Contingencies: Always budget a little extra for unexpected costs that might arise during the process.

By understanding these factors, you can better prepare for and manage the expenses involved in bulletproofing your 6.0L diesel engine, ensuring your investment yields reliability and peace of mind.

What are the specifications and limitations of the Ford Excursion Diesel’s payload and towing capacity?

Understanding the Ford Excursion Diesel’s Payload and Towing Capacity

When evaluating the Ford Excursion Diesel’s specifications, it’s essential to consider its payload, towing capacity, and the numbers associated with these features.

Key Specifications:

• Front Gross Axle Weight Rating (GAWR):4,700 lbs
• Rear Gross Axle Weight Rating (GAWR):5,250 lbs
• Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR):9,200 lbs
• Maximum Trailer Weight:11,000 lbs
• Gross Combined Weight Rating (GCWR):20,000 lbs
• Payload Capacity:1,525 lbs

Analyzing the Numbers

1. Axle Capacity vs. GVWR:
   • The total axle capacity, combining front and rear GAWR, reaches 9,950 lbs.
   • Interestingly, the GVWR is lower at 9,200 lbs. This disparity might seem conservative, but manufacturers often do this to maintain vehicle longevity and safety under various operating conditions.
2. Payload Considerations:
   • With a payload capacity of 1,525 lbs, this accounts for passengers, cargo, and any additional equipment loaded onto the vehicle.
   • To ensure optimal performance and safety, staying within this limit is crucial.
3. Towing Capacity:
   • The significant towing capability allows for a maximum trailer weight of 11,000 lbs.
   • This impressive capacity makes it versatile for various heavy-duty towing needs.

These specifications illustrate the Excursion’s design balance between power and practicality, ensuring both safety and performance. Whether for work or recreational use, understanding these limits helps ensure your vehicle operates efficiently and safely.

What improvements were made to the Ford Excursion in terms of suspension and payload over the years?

Improvements in Suspension and Payload for the Ford Excursion Over Time

In the early 2000s, the Ford Excursion was crafted with a focus on delivering a heavy and comfortable driving experience. However, back then, cargo capacity wasn’t prioritized, leaving a gap in its capability as a robust hauler.

Owners who put their Excursions through strenuous tasks, like towing heavy loads, often found themselves overburdening the vehicle. Towing a hefty boat, for example, frequently revealed the limitations of the Excursion’s original suspension system and payload capacity. The early models, such as those from 2004, were not equipped with the heavy-duty suspension systems needed for such demands.

Key Enhancements

1. Suspension Upgrades: Over the years, advancements were made to the Excursion’s suspension system, addressing the need for a more supportive and durable ride. The enhancements included bigger and better-engineered suspension components that helped manage heavier weights and offered improved stability.
2. Payload Capacity: As the demand for robust load-bearing vehicles grew, subsequent models of the Excursionsaw improvements in their payload capabilities. These upgrades allowed the vehicle to handle heavier loads without compromising comfort or safety.
3. Diesel Performance: For those who preferred diesel, the Excursion evolved to enhance its capabilities, although early models still faced challenges with towing when compared to later improvements.

Overall, these refinements positioned the Ford Excursion as a more well-rounded vehicle capable of handling greater demands, offering both quietness and the strength consumers desired.

What are common issues and solutions related to the 6.0L diesel engine in the Ford Excursion?

Common Issues and Solutions for the 6.0L Diesel Engine in the Ford Excursion

The Ford Excursion’s 6.0L diesel engine, introduced in 2003, has had its share of both admirers and critics. Here’s a breakdown of common issues and potential solutions to enhance its reliability and performance:

Common Issues

1. EGR System Problems
   The Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) system in the 6.0L is known for malfunctions, potentially leading to engine overheating.
2. Oil Cooler Failures
   Clogged oil coolers can reduce engine efficiency and raise operating temperatures, risking more severe engine damage.
3. Head Gasket Issues
   High pressure in the cylinders can cause the head gaskets to fail, requiring timely intervention.
4. Fuel Injector Troubles
   Faulty fuel injectors may lead to poor engine performance and lower fuel economy.

Solutions and Upgrades

• EGR Delete Kits
  Many owners opt for an EGR delete to improve reliability and reduce the risk of overheating.
• Upgraded Oil Coolers
  Investing in a new or upgraded oil cooler can prevent clogs and help maintain better engine performance.
• Head Studs for Reinforcement
  Installing stronger head studs can prevent gasket failures by ensuring a tighter seal.
• Professional Engine Bullet-Proofing
  For those seeking comprehensive reliability, a process known as “bullet-proofing” can address these common issues. This process typically ranges from $5,000 to $10,000, depending on the parts and labor involved.

Additional Considerations

• Performance vs. Cost
  While enhancements can significantly improve the engine’s durability, weighing the costs against potential benefits is crucial. Some owners report spending between $8,000 and $12,000 for extensive upgrades, although prices vary by location and service provider.
• Impact on Fuel Economy
  Keep in mind that modifications, particularly with larger engines, can affect fuel consumption. It’s essential to balance power gains with practicality.

In conclusion, with the right upgrades and maintenance, the 6.0L diesel engine in the Ford Excursion can deliver robust performance. Owners should remain informed about potential issues and consider investing in proven solutions to ensure a reliable driving experience.

What are the opinions on various engines used in the Ford Super Duty lineup, including the 7.3L Navistar and the 6.7L Scorpion?

Opinions on Ford Super Duty Engine Lineup: The 7.3L Navistar vs. The 6.7L Scorpion

When it comes to the engines powering Ford’s Super Duty trucks, enthusiasts often passionately debate their preferences. Two standout engines frequently mentioned are the 7.3L Navistar and the 6.7L Scorpion. Here’s a closer look at the opinions surrounding these robust engines.

The 7.3L Navistar: A Timeless Icon

• Reputation: Many truck enthusiasts hail the 7.3L Navistar as one of the best engines Ford has ever implemented in its Super Duty lineup. Its proven reliability and durability make it a top choice for those seeking long-term value.
• Performance: Known for its simplicity and robustness, the 7.3L is praised especially by those who have owned older models, pointing to its ability to handle heavy-duty tasks with ease.

The 6.7L Scorpion: Modern Powerhouse

• Initial Concerns: This newer generation engine had some early challenges, including valve stem issues in its initial builds. However, these issues appear to have been largely resolved in more recent iterations.
• Power and Reliability: Owners of the 6.7L Scorpion often describe it as a “beast,” highlighting its significant power output and hefty torque. With reports of engines exceeding 190,000 miles with minimal issues, it presents a compelling option for those seeking a modern powerhouse.
• Market Desirability: The allure of models boasting higher horsepower, such as those reaching 475 HP, makes the 6.7L a hot topic for potential buyers considering an upgrade.

Choosing Your Engine

When deciding between the tried-and-tested 7.3L Navistar and the formidable 6.7L Scorpion, it largely depends on personal preference and what you value in a truck engine. The Navistar is often favored for its classic reliability, while the Scorpion offers cutting-edge performance for those interested in newer truck models.

No matter which engine you lean toward, understanding the nuances and feedback from long-time users can help guide your decision in choosing the right engine for your needs and budget.

What challenges are associated with the Ford Excursion’s engine, specifically the 6.0L diesel?

Challenges with the Ford Excursion’s 6.0L Diesel Engine

The Ford Excursion’s 6.0L diesel engine, while highly regarded by some, came with its set of challenges that potential buyers should consider.

Costly Upgrades

Owners often found themselves needing to invest an additional $8,000 to $10,000 to optimize the 6.0L engine’s performance and reliability. These modifications usually involved upgrading components to prevent known issues that frequently arose with the stock model.

Fuel Efficiency Concerns

Another notable point of contention was fuel consumption. Although the V10 variant was more notorious for high fuel usage, the diesel still demanded attention to fuel economy, especially for owners unaccustomed to handling such a large vehicle.

Underpowered Alternatives

When comparing engine options, the Excursion’s V8 version was criticized for lacking the necessary power to effectively move the SUV’s substantial mass. This often led drivers to seek out the more robust diesel or V10 options, both of which came with their own set of issues.

Handling and Ride Quality

The vehicle’s design featured front leaf springs, which contributed to a less comfortable ride quality. This design choice, coupled with a poor turning radius, made maneuvering the SUV a challenge. Additionally, the stress on components like ball joints was significant, leading to frequent maintenance and replacements.

Environmental and Safety Considerations

Despite its robust design, heightened environmental regulations eventually made the Excursion less feasible for production. Furthermore, concerns about the vehicle’s high profile contributing to rollover risks, especially when driven aggressively, played a role in its discontinuation.

The Ford Excursion, for all its promise, required considerable attention and investment to overcome these inherent challenges.

How does the Ford Excursion compare to other vehicles in terms of ride quality and cargo capacity?

When comparing the Ford Excursion to other vehicles, especially from the early 2000s, two aspects stand out: ride quality and cargo capacity.

Ride Quality

The Excursion was designed with comfort in mind, offering a smooth and quiet ride. This puts it on par with other large SUVs from that era, like the Suburban. Ford aimed to deliver a vehicle that could handle long hauls effortlessly, making it an appealing choice for families seeking comfort on the road.

Cargo Capacity

At the time, cargo capacity wasn’t the highlight for vehicles of this size. The focus was more on passenger comfort rather than sheer load capability. While the Excursion can handle a reasonable amount of cargo, pushing it to tow heavy loads, like a 12,000-pound boat, often meant it performed beyond its optimal range. The lack of robust suspension and payload capacity upgrades, which only came in later years, left it less suited as a heavy-duty workhorse compared to its more modern counterparts.

Key Takeaway

Although it delivered a pleasant driving experience, the Excursion’s cargo capabilities were limited compared to the demands of heavier towing needs. For those primarily interested in ride quality, it was a strong contender, but for substantial cargo or towing capacity, newer models with enhanced suspensions would be a better fit.

How did the introduction of different diesel engines over the years affect the Ford Excursion’s performance?

Based on the F250 Super Duty pickup, the Ford Excursion is considered a heavy-duty Class 2 truck. A 3/4 ton chassis with front and rear beam axles and engine options ranging from the 5.4L Triton V-8, the 6.8L Triton V-10, and the dreamy 7.3L Power Stroke V-8 Turbo Diesel. It featured a Dana 50 front axle (it is like a Dana 60 housing with Dana 44 insides), and a Ford/Sterling 10.5 rear axle, it shared three quarters of its frame with the F250, and most of its hard components were the same as well.

The Excursion was introduced in model year 2000 and ended in 2005. During its production, the vehicle saw a critical evolution in its diesel engine lineup that impacted performance capabilities:

• 2000-2003: Offered the renowned 7.3L Navistar diesel engine. Known for its robust power, this engine made the Excursion a powerhouse in its class.
• 2003-2005: Introduced the 6.0L diesel engine, offering a different performance dynamic with emphasis on newer technology and improved efficiency.

Notably, the 6.4L diesel was not introduced until 2008, meaning the Excursion never had this engine. Throughout these years, all diesel options were paired exclusively with automatic transmissions and offered in both 4×2 and 4×4 drive configurations, enhancing the vehicle’s versatility and appeal.

This evolution of diesel engines over the years not only marked a shift in power and performance but also defined the Excursion’s adaptability to varying consumer needs from towing heavy loads to providing a comfortable ride for family road trips.

Does the timeline of engine availability suggest a comparison between the 7.3L and 6.0L engines?

Yes, the timeline indicates a shift from the 7.3L to the 6.0L diesel engine, which can lead to discussions about their performance and differences.

What were the transmission and drive configuration options for the diesel engines in the Excursion?

Both diesel engines were available exclusively with automatic transmissions and could be configured in either 4×2 or 4×4 drive setups.

When did the 7.3L diesel engine get replaced by the 6.0L diesel engine, and was the 6.4L diesel ever used in the Excursion?

The 7.3L diesel was replaced by the 6.0L diesel in 2003. The 6.4L diesel was never used in the Excursion.

Which diesel engines were available in the Ford Excursion during specific years?

The 7.3L diesel engine was offered from 2000 to 2003, while the 6.0L diesel became available in 2004 and 2005.

How did the design and purpose of vehicles like the Ford Excursion and Suburban from the early 2000s affect their towing capabilities?

Being the ultimate plus-sized SUV, we can understand why. These monstrosities combined all the best parts of American diesel full-sized trucks and mixed them with the legacy of big SUVs. Suddenly with that power stroke under the hood, you had a massive SUV that was infinitely reliable, could tow exceptionally well, and still managed to get over 20 miles per gallon.

However, while these vehicles were built to be heavy and comfortable, they had their limitations. During the early 2000s, cargo capacity was often overlooked, and towing heavy loads could push these SUVs to their limits. Many owners found themselves overloaded, especially when towing large items like boats. The situation could be worse with certain engine types, where even diesel options posed challenges in terms of weight distribution and overall capacity.

It’s important to note that at the time, the design didn’t focus much on heavy payloads. It wasn’t until a few years later that advancements in suspensions and payload capabilities were introduced. Despite these limitations, the ride offered by these SUVs was still smooth and quiet, providing a unique blend of comfort and power that appealed to many drivers.

In conclusion, while the early 2000s SUVs may not have been the workhorses some believed them to be, they laid the groundwork for future innovations in towing and cargo capacity.